Honeypot target8/12/2023 However, none of those numbers mean anything if your SOC team can’t do something with the information that’s coming in. Looking at the numbers may inspire confidence in the solution, especially if your ROI looks strong with low-effort and high returns on your incidents. Whichever type of honeypot solution you use, the most important element to consider is how actionable your intel is from the system. With the information you glean from an isolated attacker, you can enforce and strengthen your policy creation to double down on your security overall. Micro-segmentation technology is a powerful way to segment your live environment from your honeypot decoy, ensuring that attackers cannot make lateral moves to sensitive data. Mitigating the risk of using a high interaction honeypot is easiest when you choose a security solution that uses honeypot technology as one branch of an in-depth solution. You could also use your honeypot solution to separate internal and external deception, keeping you safe from cyber threats that move East-West as well as North-South. The technology can identify returning hackers by marking them with a unique passive fingerprint. Sophisticated honeypots can simulate multiple hosts or network topologies, including HTTP and FTP servers and virtual IP addresses. Once you’ve established that the ROI makes the cost and maintenance needs worth it, using a high interaction honeypot is the best way of using deception technology to fool attackers and get the most information out of an attempted breach. Look at the projected costs for covering more of the network, and extending the amount of hours you need. A large number of incidents that only cover a small portion of the network might not be worth the maintenance and cost requirements. It’s essential to think about coverage when you are working out your ROI. You would invest the same amount of time but get substantially more incidents- that’s serious value for money. In contrast, higher interaction honeypot solutions usually take the same amount of time to manage but are more effective in uncovering incidents. A low interaction honeypot usually takes a substantial amount of time to manage and update, but even if you only invest 5 hours a month, and find just 1 quality incident, that’s very low ROI. Your honeypot solution is costing you more than it’s worth. If your result is smaller than one, then you have a problem. Take the amount of quality incidents that your honeypot uncovers each month, and divide that by the hours you invest in the system in said month. One way to decide what kind of honeypot you need is to consider the ROI, how much the honeypot solution is costing you in management overhead, compared to the actual detection of cyberattacks. For example, a medium interaction honeypot might emulate a Microsoft IIS web server and have sophisticated enough functionality to attract a certain attack that researchers want more information about. These would still not be suitable for complex threats such as zero day exploits, but could target attackers looking for specific vulnerabilities. For many, a medium interaction honeypot strategy is the best balance, providing less risk than creating a complete physical or virtualized system to divert attackers, but with more functionality. Of course, the biggest downside to a high interaction honeypot is the time and effort it takes to build the decoy system at the start, and then to maintain the monitoring of it long-term in order to mitigate risk for your company. If your vendor team or in-house team has a research arm that works behind the scenes to uncover new and emerging cyber threats, this can be a great tool to allow them to learn relevant information about the latest tactics and trends. With today’s cutting-edge dynamic deception methods, a high interaction honeypot can adapt to each incident, making it far less likely that the attacker will realize they are engaging with a decoy. Using a high interaction honeypot, researchers can learn the tools an attacker uses to escalate privileges, or the lateral movements they make to attempt to uncover sensitive data. As the systems are only present as a decoy, any traffic that is found is by its very existence malicious, making it easy to spot threats and track and trace an attackers behavior. Rather than simply emulate certain protocols or services, the attacker is provided with real systems to attack, making it far less likely they will guess they are being diverted or observed. A high interaction honeypot is the opposite end of the scale in deception technology.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |